- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:48:22 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 18/10/2012 14:39, Dave Reynolds wrote: [..] > > ARGH! I now see that you've raised this as an issue on ORG. Did you > mean to do that? Surely this is an issue for the ontology formerly > known as the Legal Entity vocabulary. It's not an issue for ORG as such and I'm as keen as you that this does *not* hold up the LC transition - it shouldn't. I do, however, think it helpful at this stage to clarify what the LE/RCE/WTF vocab is about and why org:FormalOrganization isn't (quite) specific enough. -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 13:48:48 UTC