W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: ISSUE-38 (Registered what?): Name of the vocab formerly known as Core Business Vocabulary, currently called Legal Entity [Organization Ontology]

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:48:22 +0100
Message-ID: <508008A6.5060307@w3.org>
To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
CC: public-gld-wg@w3.org 


On 18/10/2012 14:39, Dave Reynolds wrote:
[..]

>
> ARGH!  I now see that you've raised this as an issue on ORG. Did you
> mean to do that?  Surely this is an issue for the ontology formerly
> known as the Legal Entity vocabulary.

It's not an issue for ORG as such and I'm as keen as you that this does 
*not* hold up the LC transition - it shouldn't. I do, however, think it 
helpful at this stage to clarify what the LE/RCE/WTF vocab is about and 
why org:FormalOrganization isn't (quite) specific enough.



-- 


Phil Archer
W3C eGovernment
http://www.w3.org/egov/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 13:48:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:04 UTC