- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 15:39:28 -0700
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 22:39:59 UTC
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > > On May 20, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > > All, > > > > I was editing the chapter on isolation [1] and wondered if inline svg > should happen in an isolated group. (So the <svg> tag would establish a new > group/stacking context) > > It seems that it would be very hard to implement if this was not the > case. > > > > Is everyone that inline SVG is always isolated? > > > > We also need to discuss what other constructs in SVG create isolation. > The current filter spec assumes that nothing does, but that doesn't > correspond with reality. > > The first question is how inline SVG cooperates with HTML in general. We > did not specify that anywhere to my knowledge. In Blink and WebKit inline > SVG elements are handled as replacement elements, same as <img>, <video> or > <canvas>. It would make sense to not treat inline SVG elements different > from the other elements for these two engines. However, I would like to > understand where you see the technical difference to other "graphical" HTML > elements like <div> or <p>. > I'm unsure what you are asking. Browser are indeed treating svg as a canvas (and not as a change from the css box model to the svg drawing model) so it makes sense to have the content isolated.
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 22:39:59 UTC