On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote: > > On May 20, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> > wrote: > >> On May 20, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> All, > >>> > >>> I was editing the chapter on isolation [1] and wondered if inline svg > should happen in an isolated group. (So the <svg> tag would establish a new > group/stacking context) > >>> It seems that it would be very hard to implement if this was not the > case. > >>> > >>> Is everyone that inline SVG is always isolated? > >>> > >>> We also need to discuss what other constructs in SVG create isolation. > The current filter spec assumes that nothing does, but that doesn't > correspond with reality. > >> > >> The first question is how inline SVG cooperates with HTML in general. > We did not specify that anywhere to my knowledge. In Blink and WebKit > inline SVG elements are handled as replacement elements, same as <img>, > <video> or <canvas>. It would make sense to not treat inline SVG elements > different from the other elements for these two engines. > > > > Agreed, and this means that they're an isolated group for the purpose > > of compositing. > > I am absolutely fine with that. I am just curious what the technical > problems are. > Do you mean technical problems from a spec's standpoint or from the browser's standpoint?
Received on Monday, 20 May 2013 22:42:07 UTC