- From: Stella Dextre Clarke <stella@lukehouse.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:02:17 +0100
- To: "public-esw-thes@w3.org" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
- CC: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, "LAABOUDI Christine (OP)" <Christine.LAABOUDI@publications.europa.eu>, Barbara Tillett <btil@loc.gov>, "Svensson, Lars" <l.svensson@d-nb.de>
In support of Christine's suggestion I'd point out that the issue has been aired at several events in the past year, e.g. the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization (http://linux2.fbi.fh-koeln.de/cisko2010/presentations.html) and the NKOS workshop in Glasgow (http://www.comp.glam.ac.uk/pages/research/hypermedia/nkos/nkos2010/programme.html), where I gave a presentation on the Types of mapping recommended in ISO 25964. There seems no doubt that for applications in which good quality mappings are needed from one thesaurus to another, there is a demand for compound equivalence mappings. ISO 25964 includes recommendations for the development and use of such mappings. And in another reply to this posting, Johan de Smedt presents some ideas for a schema to use. At both the above conferences it was pointed out that an extension to SKOS would be required. Is there any hope that W3C may soon be able to support/encourage work on such an extension? Stella -- ***************************************************** Stella Dextre Clarke Information Consultant Luke House, West Hendred, Wantage, OX12 8RR, UK Tel: 01235-833-298 Fax: 01235-863-298 stella@lukehouse.org ***************************************************** Bernard Vatant wrote: > Dear Christine > > The SKOS core is now a W3C recommendation and is a stable document that > will not be changed. > That said, extension for compound (cordinated) concepts is clearly > needed and could someday be put either on the W3C track, either taken in > charge somehow by the librarian community. > Beyond SKOS users on this forum, I cc to Barbara Tillett at LoC, with > whom I remember exchanging a few words at IFLA 2010 about it, and Lars > Svensson at D-NB. > Seems to me there are coordinated concepts in the D-NB linked data > publication (Lars correct me if I am wrong) but I could not figure out > the ontology used. > > Best > > Bernard > > > 2011/6/21 LAABOUDI Christine (OP) > <Christine.LAABOUDI@publications.europa.eu > <mailto:Christine.LAABOUDI@publications.europa.eu>> > > Dear all, > > In the framework of our Thesaurus Alignment project and on the > behalf of the members of the Thesaurus Working Group, we would like > to suggest the addition of a new “compound mapping” property in the > SKOS-Core. > > Examples of mapping between EUR-LEX directory Code (T1) and EuroVoc (T2) > > A] Intersective Mapping > > T1 04.10.40 Fisheries / Common fisheries policy / State aids > ExactMatch > T2 (common fishery policy AND state aids) > > B] Cumulative Mapping > > T1 03.06.53 Eggs and poultry ExactMatch T2 (poultry OR egg) > > Best regards, > > > Christine LAABOUDI-SPOIDEN > Publications Office > EUR-Lex - Eurovoc Team > MER 127 > Tel: +352 2929 42858 > > > > > > > > > -- > Bernard Vatant > Senior Consultant > Vocabulary & Data Integration > Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 > Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> > ---------------------------------------------------- > Mondeca > 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France > Web: http://www.mondeca.com > Blog: http://mondeca.wordpress.com > ----------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 14:02:00 UTC