public-esw-thes@w3.org from December 2008 by author

Aida Slavic

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships/best practice role of SKOS (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• CFP: Classification at a Crossroads: multiple direction to usability, 29-30 October, The Hague (Monday, 15 December)

Alasdair J G Gray

• SemAst 2009: 2nd Call for Papers (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Thursday, 4 December)
• SemAst 2009: Call for Papers (Monday, 1 December)

Alistair Miles

• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Wednesday, 17 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Thursday, 4 December)

Antoine Isaac

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Monday, 15 December)
• RE : Different concepts with the same label? (Monday, 8 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Thursday, 4 December)

Christophe Dupriez

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Friday, 19 December)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Monday, 22 December)

Dupriez Christophe

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)

Ed Summers

• Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)

Johan De Smedt

• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Friday, 5 December)

Leonard Will

• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Monday, 22 December)
• Re: Why RDF? was: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Monday, 15 December)
• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Thursday, 4 December)

Lopez, Tamara

• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Thursday, 18 December)

Rob Tice

• RE: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)

Sascha Kranz

• Different concepts with the same label? (Saturday, 6 December)

Stephen Bounds

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Thursday, 18 December)

Thomas Baker

• Re: ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships (Tuesday, 16 December)

Last message date: Monday, 22 December 2008 12:05:53 UTC