- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:14:42 +0100
- To: Dupriez Christophe <christophe_dupriez@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: Aida Slavic <aida@acorweb.net>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "public-swd-wg@w3.org" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, "public-esw-thes@w3.org" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Hi Christophe, On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:59:56AM +0000, Dupriez Christophe wrote: > MARC is very complex, OK. Dublin Core has provided a lowest > common denominator for exchanges between human users. But > Dublin Core has forgotten many of MARC qualities (semantical > precision for instance) and has not really benefitted from > the knowledge of MARC pitfalls (semantical adequation of > data for foreseen real purposes). Dublin Core is correct for > "information discovery" but is now used for "information > management" which is a painful problem. I wanted to point out that "Dublin Core" is more than a set of fifteen elements used with string values (a usage which is now referred to as "Simple Dublin Core"). The fifteen elements are part of a larger vocabulary "DCMI Metadata Terms" [1] which, as RDF properties and classes, are just as extensible as properties and classes in SKOS. A "Dublin Core application profile" [2] uses properties from RDF vocabularies, as needed, to address specific real purposes. Most of the properties in DCMI Metadata Terms also have formally defined ranges -- more for purposes of machine processing than for exchanges between human users. There is an interesting parallel between the design trade-offs described by Antoine with respect to the specificity or generic nature of SKOS and the specificity of the RDF vocabularies defined around the fifteen-element Dublin Core. I do not believe there is a "perfect" balance between simplicity and complexity; rather, the solution lies in providing mechanisms for principled extensibility. I'm not sure if this addresses your point about "semantical adequation of data", but the extensibility of the vocabularies plus the notion of mixed-vocabulary profiles means that profiles can be designed to be as complex or management-oriented as needed. Tom (who also works with DCMI) [1] http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ (see also http://yoyodesign.org/doc/dcmi/dcmi-terms/ in French) [2] http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/01/14/singapore-framework/ -- Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 11:15:30 UTC