- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:47:55 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'Tudhope D S (Comp)'" <dstudhope@glam.ac.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
>> >>Should have mentioned, I tentatively decided to drop the skos:Facet class >>and the skos:inFacet and skos:facetMember properties in SKOS-Core 1.0 after >>there was some contention as to whether this had been modelled in the right >>way. >> >>But Doug if you think the way it was done was OK for now, then I'm happy to >>re-include it. >> >> >> All else being equal, I suspect it might make life easier to use a class Facet, so owl:disjointWith can be used directly rather than having to construct intermediate constraint sets 'on the fly'. Cheers, Danny.
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 08:47:45 UTC