W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-esw-thes@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Facets in SKOS-Core 1.0

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:36:13 -0500 (EST)
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Cc: "'Tudhope D S (Comp)'" <dstudhope@glam.ac.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0403160730380.7960@homer.w3.org>

Hi Alistair,

a minor comment and a question.

Comment - since rdfs:label is a human readable label rather than for
machines, it seems better to me if you just put spaces between words. If you
want to auto-generate property names from labels you can do so by globbing
them together (or camel-casing them, or whatever) but as far as the machine
is concerned you could also do so by selecting random combinations of arabic
and chinese characters that don't already appear in your schema. This would
probably encourage people to build interfaces that look for human-readable
text to present things, so may be beneficial (although I suspect there are
still enough hand-coders out there that there is some value in legible tag

The question (because I don't know the answer) is "how would you express the
disjoint condition in RDF?"



On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Miles, AJ (Alistair)  wrote:

>Hi Doug, all,
>Should have mentioned, I tentatively decided to drop the skos:Facet class
>and the skos:inFacet and skos:facetMember properties in SKOS-Core 1.0 after
>there was some contention as to whether this had been modelled in the right
>But Doug if you think the way it was done was OK for now, then I'm happy to
>re-include it.
>The statements above are based on the principal that facets are disjoint
>classes (although the disjoint condition is sometimes broken and therefore
>is not expressed as a formal constraint), and facet members are class
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 07:36:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:45:10 UTC