- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:56:51 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Dan Brickley wrote: >* Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> [2004-03-16 12:41-0000] > > >>I believe SKOS-Core is suitable for encoding any type of KOS whose >>fundamental unit may be modelled as a concept. >> >> > >What is a concept? > >Sorry, had to ask... > >(might also ask what a fundamental unit is... what's the fundamental >unit of RDF? terms? URIs? resources? classes? hard to tell...) > > > > It might be an idea to have a nosey around the SUO [1] and Conceptual Graph [2] material for wording of parts like this - they've spent a lot of time counting these angels. Fundamental unit of the =>Resource<= [hint hint] Description Framework? (Mind you, that would probably lead to "Thing Ontology Language") Cheers, Danny. [1] http://suo.ieee.org/ [2] http://www.jfsowa.com/cg/index.htm > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 08:56:36 UTC