- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:26:25 -0000
- To: "Dan Brickley (E-mail)" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
:) Defined in SKOS-Core 1.0 Guide as 'any unit of thought that may be defined or described.' Might better be described as a 'unit of meaning' or something like that. In contrast to e.g. traditional thesauri, where the fundamental unit is usually a 'term', and hence where the intended meaning of the unit and the labels used to refer to it are confounded. NB. I never use the word 'term' any more, because when somebody in this line of work refers to a 'term' I've realised they usually have some idea of meaning attached to it (which may be a specially redefined meaning known only within a limited scope). I.e. the meaning and the label have not been separated. Hence I deliberately avoid using the word 'term' anywhere in the SKOS-Core 1.0 guide, but always use 'label' as a name for the character strings or symbols that are used by people to refer to concepts. In my mind, 'term' = 'concept' + 'label'. Al. P.s. if you think about this too much, you end up spiralling into non-existence. --- Alistair Miles Research Associate CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Building R1 Room 1.60 Fermi Avenue Chilton Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QX United Kingdom Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@w3.org] > Sent: 16 March 2004 12:57 > To: Miles, AJ (Alistair) > Cc: 'public-esw-thes@w3.org' > Subject: Re: Coverage of SKOS-Core 1.0 > > > > * Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> [2004-03-16 12:41-0000] > > > > I believe SKOS-Core is suitable for encoding any type of KOS whose > > fundamental unit may be modelled as a concept. > > What is a concept? > > Sorry, had to ask... > > (might also ask what a fundamental unit is... what's the fundamental > unit of RDF? terms? URIs? resources? classes? hard to tell...) > > Dan >
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 08:26:59 UTC