Re: EOCred: Coverage & renewal of credential

Let's go for it!

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> wrote:

> Picking up from the discussion about 'other requirements', Nate Otto
> suggested we align with validFor <http://schema.org/validFor> from the
> Permit <http://schema.org/Permit> type to express the period for which an
> educational occupational credential is valid. This relates to our use case
> that "having found a credential it should be possible to identify what is
> required to renew or maintain the validity of that credential".
>
> We also have a use case to show the coverage of a credential, i.e. the
> geographic area or jurisdiction for which the credential is valid, which
> came up during our discussions on the language of a credential. The
> validIn <http://schema.org/validIn> property from the Permit type would
> cover this.
>
> So the proposal is that we adjust the expected domain of validFor and
> validIn to include Educational Occupational Credentials, and modify the
> definitions to refer to "permits and credentials".
>
> Comments?
>
> Phil
>
>
> validFor: http://schema.org/validFor
>
> Permit: http://schema.org/Permit
>
> validIn: http://schema.org/validIn
> --
>
> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning;
> information systems for education.
> CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education
> technology.
>
> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company,
> number SC569282.
> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in
> England number OC399090
>

Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 16:07:44 UTC