Re: Which document to attack next?

Actually we decided that all of these documents - while having been checked
for accuracy, current browser and technology references, and  broken links
- they all need tersification review.  Nearly all of them are too long and
wordy.

So Nic, I will prioritize these for your review as follows:

   - The work on choosing tools with Laura - top priority

After that, please ask Eric to put content in new skin and
review for brevity, clarity, plain language, and active voice in this order:

   - First Aid : Interim Repairs <https://www.w3.org/WAI/impl/Overview>
   - Planning and Managing Guide <https://www.w3.org/WAI/impl/Overview>
   (including sub pages)
   - Involving Users  (web projects)
   <https://www.w3.org/WAI/users/involving>
   - Involving Users (evaluation) <https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/users>
   - Developing Organizational policies  <https://www.w3.org/WAI/impl/pol>this
   one has a note to "address submitted comments" but I have no idea where
   those comments might be.

You can start by looking at Vicki's notes in the spreadsheet and let us
know if you have any questions.

Best,
Sharron




On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Bakken, Brent <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
wrote:

> Oh, Okay.
>
> Then until we check with Shawn for other updates she has completed, the
> next ones are lower priority (only do when Nic has no other to attend to),
> they are the tutorials (lines 14-19).
> What do you think Sharron? Do those next when nothing else is ready?
>
> I will respond to Laura and Nic's "Selecting Eval Tools" right now so that
> will be ready too.
>
>
>
>
> Brent A. Bakken
> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
> Pearson
>
> 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087>
> brent.bakken@pearson.com
>
> Learn more at pearson.com
>
> [image: Pearson]
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>
> wrote:
>
>> He already completed edits on Contacting Orgs...needs review
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2017 3:17 PM, "Bakken, Brent" <brent.bakken@pearson.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Nic,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the email. Looking at the spreadsheet it looks like a lot of
>>> them need Shawn to do some minor update first and then it is on to you. I
>>> can follow up with Shawn about where she is on her step and get the
>>> spreadsheet updated. I guess the next one you could tackle is the top on on
>>> row 2 (Contacting Orgs about inaccessible Sites). Column G indicates that
>>> one is ready for you.
>>>
>>> Also, just a heads up. We met this morning about the resource you and
>>> Laura are working on, "Selecting Eval Tools". I have some feedback for the
>>> plan that you two put together. I will be emailing that out to you and
>>> Laura in a moment. Once you have that, the two of you can start working on
>>> the edits to that resource as well. That will be highest priority for you.
>>>
>>> I hope this helps you out.
>>> Talk to you soon,
>>> Brent
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Brent A. Bakken
>>> Director, Accessibility Strategy & Education Services
>>> Pearson
>>>
>>> 512 202 1087 <(512)%20202-1087>
>>> brent.bakken@pearson.com
>>>
>>> Learn more at pearson.com
>>>
>>> [image: Pearson]
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Nic Steenhout <nic@knowbility.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Sharron, Brent,
>>>>
>>>> I was starting work on "Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion", and
>>>> was asking Eric Eggert about write access to the document in GitHub. After
>>>> a bit of discussion and him checking in with Shawn, it appears that this
>>>> document needs other edits before being touched.
>>>>
>>>> This leads me to wonder if perhaps I could get a list of which
>>>> documents I should approach first?
>>>>
>>>> Does something like that already exist? The EOWG Resource Management
>>>> spreadsheet in google docs I see doesn't have that indication (that I can
>>>> see).
>>>>
>>>> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>>
>>>> Nic
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>


-- 
Sharron Rush | Executive Director | Knowbility.org | @knowbility
*Equal access to technology for people with disabilities*