- From: Kam Hay Fung via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 02:31:22 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
They look much clearer in Figs 2-11 (excl 4). Nice work. Here are some feedback: **dct:conformsTo** In Figure 2, "`dct:confromsTo`" should be "`dct:conformsTo`". In Figure 11, both "`dct:conformsTo`" and "`conforms to`" appear. Do they mean the same thing? **dct:format** It inconsistently appears in many forms, e.g. - "`dct:format`" (Figure 2) - "`has format`" (Figure 3) - "`format`" (Figure 7) Please cross check all the diagrams and use the single form. "`dct:hasFormat`", in Dublin Core (https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#terms-hasFormat) reads better as a complete sentence in the unidirectional relationship `A--dct:hasFormat-->B` than `A--dct:format-->B`. However, "`dct:hasFormat`" seems to have a slightly different meaning. **Redundant Legends** It seems that Figures 12-17 still have the legends which are now available in Figure 1. They can be removed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kamhayfung Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/687#issuecomment-533844506 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2019 02:31:23 UTC