- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:31:57 -0700
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <53528822-2b22-3a96-19f4-1b714f75a860@lbl.gov>
some examples: * Requirement: Profiles may provide rules on cardinality of terms (including “recommended”) [ID41] (5.41) [profile] * Requirement: Profiles may provide rules governing value validity [ID41] (5.41) [profile] * Requirement: Profiles may express dependencies between elements of the vocabulary (if A then not B, etc.) [ID41] (5.41) [profile] * Requirement: Profiles can have rules for data value validation, including pick lists [ID46] (5.46) [profile] On 6/2/18 12:17 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > I'm not sure which ones you see as requirements for a spec. Can you give > a couple of examples? > > My take is that as we were developing the use cases most of them were > about requirements for profiles, not requirements for a profile guidance > document. And we would take those requirements for profiles and turn > them into a guidance document. > > kc > > On 6/1/18 9:06 PM, Annette Greiner wrote: >> Are these supposed to be requirements as in >> >> "these are the things the spec we are writing needs to accomplish" >> >> or requirements as in >> >> "these are the things a profile needs to have to be a profile"? >> >> To me, the requirements listed on the agenda read as the latter, which >> are the contents of a spec (e.g., they use terms like "can" and "may"), >> but other requirements in the GDoc read as the former, which are >> requirements for a spec. >> >> -Annette >> >> >> On 6/1/18 6:54 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: >>> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.06.05 >>> >>> Jaroslav organized the requirements into categories, and the first few >>> categories are in the agenda for our discussion. PLEASE take a look at >>> them and be ready to vote. We will try to vote on entire categories >>> unless there are objections to specific requirements. If you will not be >>> at the meeting but wish to comment or vote, you may do so in email and >>> we will do our best to include your views. -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 18:32:25 UTC