- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 18:42:49 +0200
- To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Hi, I'd echo Annette's concern here. Karen's answer was good enough for me, but Jaro's categorization is really too general. It's about functions like "Data creation and maintenance", "querying" etc. Can expressions like 'profile' and 'data expressed according to a profile' be employed to clarify the categories? This would make them longer, but at least we'd have a clearer idea of what (and what for) the requirements apply to. Cheers, Antoine On 01/06/18 19:28, Jaroslav Pullmann wrote: > > Dear Karen, dear all > > here are the same categories with an attempt to consolidate the various wordings I collected across GitHub, the F2F wiki and UCR document [1]. > Despite the peculiar approach the groupings might be of informative value for our requirements discussion. Requirements are colored in red, yet > unclear statements in gray and the context is enclosed by comment signs. > > Best regards > Jaro > > > [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1viuNJx_2dhSoEVOkjCG7cuuqzUqqR7fr4LvmP-t7T2A/edit# > > > On Friday, June 1, 2018 15:54 CEST, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > >> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.06.05 >> >> Jaroslav organized the requirements into categories, and the first few >> categories are in the agenda for our discussion. PLEASE take a look at >> them and be ready to vote. We will try to vote on entire categories >> unless there are objections to specific requirements. If you will not be >> at the meeting but wish to comment or vote, you may do so in email and >> we will do our best to include your views. >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net >> m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) >> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 >> > > > >
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 16:43:21 UTC