W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > August 2018

Re: [dxwg] Profile description model and vocabulary

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 19:13:48 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-416706850-1535483627-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
There's nothing inverted about it. Among the 4 options are 2 that include profileDesc vocabulary. I don't know why you think including it isn't desirable. Including a model in the document and a solution in a note is one of the suggested approaches based on prior discussion. I can see that you may have preferred options, but I don't understand objecting to having options that have been discussed. Are you saying that we should not consider these options?

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/323#issuecomment-416706850 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2018 19:13:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:05 UTC