- From: makxdekkers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 08:38:40 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Thanks Simon. The proposal tries to make the guidance simple. 1 and 2 are current practice. 3 is an addition specifically for ODRL policies. It would be semantically valid to use `dct:license` to refer to ODRL policies that are licences, but determining whether or not an ODRL policy is strictly limited to the characteristics of a licence may be difficult and open to legal discussion, so the proposal makes it simple: if the object is an ODRL policy, use `odrl:hasPolicy`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/114#issuecomment-382310337 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2018 08:38:42 UTC