Very much in agreement with this. And following this proposal, I'd like to report that I acted on http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/9 by including the detail of my message on https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Use_Cases. Action 9 can be closed as far as I am concerned. Makx. From: Steven Adler [mailto:adler1@us.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 7:08 PM To: Public DWBP WG; DWBP Chairs Subject: W3C Process Last call, we spend 45 minutes talking about Zakim, actions, approving minutes from the call prior, and Phil's latest (good) idea about preserving data. We had a brief mention about the use case webinar from Palo Alto, but it was about 5 minutes. In the last 15 minutes we had an interesting exchange of views. But we never got through 2/3 of the planned agenda. I would like all of our calls to be at most 15 minutes on W3C Process and at least 45 minutes exchanging views and discussing the agenda topics. Does anyone else feel this way and do we have any ideas on how we can reduce process and increase communication? Can we approve last meetings minutes via email vote prior to the next call? Can we communicate pending action item status the night before the call? Lets discuss this via email. Looking forward to your thoughts. Best Regards, Steve Motto: "Do First, Think, Do it Again"
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 19:19:10 UTC