- From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:59:41 +0100
- To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- CC: Steven Adler <adler1@us.ibm.com>, Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, DWBP Chairs <member-dwbp-chairs@w3.org>
Hi Eric, Stephen, all > Thank you for sharing your concerns, the last couple of meetings I > looked at the clock and wondered where the time had gone:-) Just a > few thoughts here, I'm wondering from a time management perspective: > * put estimated time lengths for each discussion topic. (do we do > this? I can't remember) +1 > * have a volunteer meeting time keeper who reminds us when we our > discussions have gone over. Mmm..I suggest to keep this task to the chairs > * agree for more lengthy discussions to have a separate meeting or > have the discussion continue in email. +1, and this will be more easy when we define clearly the scope of our different best practices doc. > * Instead of having some meeting items in the agenda, start them in > email and then summarize the outcome of the discussion in the meeting. > * agreed about communicating actions status the night before I am pretty sure (by experience ;-) ) that our F2F1 in London will act as a catalyst for further discussion, either by email or during our meetings. Best, Ghislain -- Ghislain Atemezing EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department Campus SophiaTech 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin Google+:http://google.com/+GhislainATEMEZING Twitter:@gatemezing
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 09:00:09 UTC