- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:59:47 -0800
- To: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Cc: "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)" <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>, DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D856DF7C-273E-43F0-A651-B6993B3DA8E2@lbl.gov>
+1 -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 510-495-2935 On Dec 5, 2014, at 8:59 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: > In my opinion, I think we just need some definitions to help the understanding of the document, like definitions for dataset, resource, vocabulary, ontology...or do we need something else ? > > cheers, > Bernadette > > 2014-12-05 13:47 GMT-03:00 Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>: > Glossary is document dependent. Vocabularies OTOH should not be so. > > > Dr. Lewis John McGibbney PhD, B.Sc., MAGU > Engineering Applications Software Engineer Level 2 > Computer Science for Data Intensive Systems Group 398M > Jet Propulsion Laboratory > California Institute of Technology > 4800 Oak Grove Drive > Pasadena, California 91109-8099 > Mail Stop : 158-256C > Tel: (+1) (818)-393-7402 > Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476 > Fax: (+1) (818)-393-1190 > Email: lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov > > > > Dare Mighty Things > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/5/14, 7:22 AM, "Annette Greiner" <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote: > > >Hi folks, > >During this morning¹s call, I asked whether developing a separate > >glossary might be redundant with the task we already have to develop a > >vocabulary. I was thinking that, since a vocabulary is a list of what is > >meant by specific terms to be used in a certain context, if we were > >writing a vocabulary that would define what we were also contemplating > >putting into a glossary, the two would be redundant. Looking again at the > >charter, I see that there are two vocabularies that we are expected to > >develop, and they are both pretty specific. Since neither of them is a > >general vocabulary for describing published datasets, I would suggest > >that we stick with adding a glossary, unless people think that there is > >something to be gained by making it a vocabulary. For my own purposes, I > >think a glossary is fine. > >-Annette > >-- > >Annette Greiner > >NERSC Data and Analytics Services > >Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > >510-495-2935 > > > > > > > > > > -- > Bernadette Farias Lóscio > Centro de Informática > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2014 21:00:21 UTC