Re: followup to question about vocabularies and the glossary

Hi Christophe,

I propose to include the template of the BP at the beginning of Section 6.
"The Best Practices"  together with a general explanation about the
organization of this section, i.e., the organization of BP according to the
lifecycle. What do you think?

Thanks!
Bernadette

2014-12-12 5:35 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@gmail.com>:
>
> Hello,
>
> About the need for something else I was just thinking that it could be
> good to keep the BP template we currently have at the end of the document
> and use it as a reading guideline for the reader.
> We could move it to the definitions, or close to the introduction, and
> update a bit the text in it so that the reader sees what each part of the
> BP answers.
>
> +1 ?
>
> Best regards,
> Christophe
>
> ----
> Researcher
> +31(0)6 14576494
> christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
> Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS/KNAW) - http://dans.knaw.nl/
> e-Humanities Group (KNAW) - http://www.ehumanities.nl/
> Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web! - http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
>
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Dec, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
> wrote:
>
> +1
> --
> Annette Greiner
> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
> 510-495-2935
>
> On Dec 5, 2014, at 8:59 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
> wrote:
>
> In my opinion, I think we just need some definitions to help the
> understanding of the document, like definitions for dataset, resource,
> vocabulary, ontology...or do we need something else ?
>
> cheers,
> Bernadette
>
> 2014-12-05 13:47 GMT-03:00 Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <
> Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>:
>
>> Glossary is document dependent. Vocabularies OTOH should not be so.
>>
>>
>> Dr. Lewis John McGibbney PhD, B.Sc., MAGU
>> Engineering Applications Software Engineer Level 2
>> Computer Science for Data Intensive Systems Group 398M
>> Jet Propulsion Laboratory
>> California Institute of Technology
>> 4800 Oak Grove Drive
>> Pasadena, California 91109-8099
>> Mail Stop : 158-256C
>> Tel:  (+1) (818)-393-7402
>> Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476
>> Fax:  (+1) (818)-393-1190
>> Email: lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov
>>
>>
>>
>>  Dare Mighty Things
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/5/14, 7:22 AM, "Annette Greiner" <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi folks,
>> >During this morning¹s call, I asked whether developing a separate
>> >glossary might be redundant with the task we already have to develop a
>> >vocabulary. I was thinking that, since a vocabulary is a list of what is
>> >meant by specific terms to be used in a certain context, if we were
>> >writing a vocabulary that would define what we were also contemplating
>> >putting into a glossary, the two would be redundant. Looking again at the
>> >charter, I see that there are two vocabularies that we are expected to
>> >develop, and they are both pretty specific. Since neither of them is a
>> >general vocabulary for describing published datasets, I would suggest
>> >that we stick with adding a glossary, unless people think that there is
>> >something to be gained by making it a vocabulary. For my own purposes, I
>> >think a glossary is fine.
>> >-Annette
>> >--
>> >Annette Greiner
>> >NERSC Data and Analytics Services
>> >Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>> >510-495-2935
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------