Re: dpvcg-ACTION-111: Generate the separate rdf files per namespace.

Dear All,

A preliminary version of rdf files is now available on the Github repo [1]

I propose the following, welcoming comments/alternatives:

1. Have 'modular' files for each sub-vocabulary (base, purpose, etc.) + 
one combined file

2. dpv-gdpr and dpv-nace have their own files and documentation (Agreed 
on 19-06-04 call)

3. Add metadata to file using "owl:Ontology" e.g. abstract, date (this 
means we would be defining these as OWL2 ontologies - any objections? We 
already have OWL2 semantics when we use union in property range) - this 
is also considered as general good practice

[1] https://github.com/dpvcg/extract-sheets/tree/rdf/docs/rdf

- Harsh

On 04/06/2019 15:15, Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community 
Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> dpvcg-ACTION-111: Generate the separate rdf files  per namespace.
>
> https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/track/actions/111
>
> Assigned to: Harshvardhan Pandit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- 
---
Harshvardhan Pandit
PhD Researcher
ADAPT Centre
Trinity College Dublin

Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2019 15:23:32 UTC