Re: Paper accepted for presentation at ODBASE 2019

Dear All,
Following reviews, I found two actionable comments.

1) the methodology followed should be better described (Review #2)
- I'm not sure as to what information is expected to be included to make 
it 'better', so have tried to make the existing information more clear.

2) In Section 6 (or in a new section), it would be nice to see a 
complete example which uses the proposed ontology. (Review #2)
- While I agree an example would be nice, I would rather first have such 
examples agreed and presented in an 'Example Use-cases' section of the 
documentation. Also, I believe Section 6 provides a good overview of 
potential usage, and Section 7 (conclusion) specifically mentions an 
intention of documenting such 'examples'.

Attached is a new draft of the paper incorporating these comments.

Regards,
Harsh

On 22/08/2019 12:41, Harshvardhan J. Pandit wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> I'm pleased to share that the paper describing DPVCG's work to date has 
> been accepted for presentation at ODBASE 2019. Reviews for the paper 
> (see below) have been positive and are encouraging towards further work 
> on the vocabularies.
> 
> The camera-ready deadline is 02-SEP - comments and assistance is welcome.
> 
> Best,
> Harsh
> 
> P.S. The submitted paper is available at 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dpvcg/2019Jul/0019.html
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:  ODABSE 2019 notification for paper 183
> Date:  Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:18:48 +0200
> From:  OTM 2019 <otm2019@easychair.org>
> To:  Harshvardhan J. Pandit <harshvardhan.pandit@adaptcentre.ie>
> 
> 
> SUBMISSION: 183
> TITLE: Creating A Vocabulary for Data Privacy
> 
> 
> ----------------------- REVIEW 1 ---------------------
> SUBMISSION: 183
> TITLE: Creating A Vocabulary for Data Privacy
> AUTHORS: Harshvardhan J. Pandit, Axel Polleres, Bert Bos, Rob Brennan, 
> Bud Bruegger, Fajar J. Ekaputra, Javier D. Fernández, Roghaiyeh Gachpaz 
> Hamed, Elmar Kiesling, Mark Lizar, Eva Schlehahn, Simon Steyskal and 
> Rigo Wenning
> 
> ----------- Overall evaluation -----------
> SCORE: 3 (strong accept)
> ----- TEXT:
> In this paper authors report on their work to provide a comprehensive 
> standard vocabulary for data privacy and legally compliant personal data 
> handling. The contribution describes the vocabulary itself along with 
> the individual sub-modules for the different aspects of privacy. 
> Furthermore, the authors provide information about their development 
> approach and the evolution of the vocabulary since its conception. They 
> detail a set of vocabularies that were considered for reuse (also 
> positioning their work within the context of the state of the art) and 
> adopted concepts, although mostly relying the SPECIAL Usage Policy 
> Language. Finally, the authors describe the various extension points of 
> the vocabulary, show example usage of the concepts and outline potential 
> parts for contribution from the community.
> 
> The paper is well-written, its structure is logical and it is 
> well-formatted. The topic is very relevant to the conference programme 
> and Semantic Web community and the work has high potential for very wide 
> practical adoption in the coming years, especially with the growing 
> adoption of GDPR. The development approach of the vocabulary is logical 
> and strictly follows the core principles of the Semantic Web. The 
> vocabulary itself is publicly available along with documentation 
> detailing the different concepts and terms. In my opinion this is an 
> excellent paper and should be presented at ODBASE.
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------- REVIEW 2 ---------------------
> SUBMISSION: 183
> TITLE: Creating A Vocabulary for Data Privacy
> AUTHORS: Harshvardhan J. Pandit, Axel Polleres, Bert Bos, Rob Brennan, 
> Bud Bruegger, Fajar J. Ekaputra, Javier D. Fernández, Roghaiyeh Gachpaz 
> Hamed, Elmar Kiesling, Mark Lizar, Eva Schlehahn, Simon Steyskal and 
> Rigo Wenning
> 
> ----------- Overall evaluation -----------
> SCORE: 2 (accept)
> ----- TEXT:
> This paper describes the main outcome from the work of the W3C’s Data 
> Privacy Vocabulary and Controls Community Group, the Data Privacy 
> Vocabulary.
> The work is well motivated and presents a solid piece of work.
> The work is well positioned wrt the related work.
> The paper is easy to read and follow.
> It describes the data privacy vocabulary and its possible use case 
> scenarios.
> 
> Section 4 aims at describing the methodology followed towards the 
> creation of the vocabulary.
> However, the methodology followed should be better described.
> The vocabulary (section 5) is well described.
> 
> In Section 6 (or in a new section), it would be nice to see a complete 
> example which uses the proposed ontology.
> 
> Considering the comments above, I recommend acceptance of the paper.
> 
> 

-- 
---
Harshvardhan Pandit
PhD Researcher
ADAPT Centre
Trinity College Dublin