W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dpvcg@w3.org > April 2019

Re: Taxonomy of legal 6bases

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:33:50 +0200
To: public-dpvcg@w3.org
Cc: "Harshvardhan J. Pandit" <me@harshp.com>, Bud Bruegger <uld613@datenschutzzentrum.de>
Message-ID: <1817482.ot9EmkKTxv@montaigne>
On Mittwoch, 3. April 2019 17:00:12 CEST Harshvardhan J. Pandit wrote:
> I agree that legal references follow the particular format (based on
> Article-Para...), however my argument was for a more "human-readable" or
> "layman-friendly" name such as consent or legitimate interest with a
> reference to its 'source' or 'definition' provided by the
> Article-Para... reference.

You can do that additionally. But please please also provide a URI for the 
legal text you cite. Note that there is a protocol for doing so IMHO within 
the ECLI/ELI - system


Note that the ELI system has not yet designed fragment identifiers that would 
allow to reference a part of an article and paragraph. 

We could invent one and just ask the publications office and the ELI WG how 
they imagine doing it. 

In our case, referring to could would say: 


Received on Thursday, 4 April 2019 07:33:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:27:57 UTC