Alexis Menard via GitHub
Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
Anton Bessonov via GitHub
Arnaud (Arno) Mandy via GitHub
- Re: [compute-pressure] Give Florian credits for his feedback (#270) (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Rename supportedSources to knownSources (#268) (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Closed: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Use-case: Current process contribution (#8) (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Clarify what supportedSources() should expose. (#266) (Tuesday, 23 April)
- [compute-pressure] Clarify what supportedSources() should expose. (#266) (Monday, 22 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Determine the behavior when calling unobserve/disconnect method before the promise returned by observe method is settled (#164) (Tuesday, 16 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Associate sample interval with source (#263) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Associated sample interval with source (#263) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move options to observe() (#261) (Friday, 5 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move Options to observe? (#259) (Thursday, 4 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] PressureObserver options object: constructor vs observe method (#256) (Tuesday, 2 April)
Carlos Lopez via GitHub
dlilga via GitHub
Evan Caldwell via GitHub
fabyeah via GitHub
Florian Scholz via GitHub
- Re: [compute-pressure] Clarify what supportedSources() should expose. (#266) (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Bikeshed the source name for per-process (#267) (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Determine the behavior when calling unobserve/disconnect method before the promise returned by observe method is settled (#164) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move source to options (#262) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] PressureObserver options object: constructor vs observe method (#256) (Friday, 5 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- [compute-pressure] PressureObserver options object: constructor vs observe method (#256) (Monday, 1 April)
Hamish Willee via GitHub
Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub
Julien Lanfrey via GitHub
Kagami Sascha Rosylight via GitHub
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
- Closed: [compute-pressure] Clarify what supportedSources() should expose. (#266) (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Rename supportedSources to knownSources (#268) (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] supportedSources should not have [SameObject] (#269) (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] supportedSources should not have [SameObject] (#269) (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] supportedSources should not have [SameObject] (#269) (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Clarify what supportedSources() should expose. (#266) (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Bikeshed the source name for per-process (#267) (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Clarify what supportedSources() should expose. (#266) (Thursday, 25 April)
- [compute-pressure] Bikeshed the source name for per-process (#267) (Wednesday, 24 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Determine the behavior when calling unobserve/disconnect method before the promise returned by observe method is settled (#164) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Determine the behavior when calling unobserve/disconnect method before the promise returned by observe method is settled (#164) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Determine the behavior when calling unobserve/disconnect method before the promise returned by observe method is settled (#164) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Consider how or whether to handle runtime errors (#115) (Monday, 15 April)
- Closed: [compute-pressure] Consider how or whether to handle runtime errors (#115) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Consider using AbortSignal in observe (#114) (Monday, 15 April)
- Closed: [compute-pressure] Consider using AbortSignal in observe (#114) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Combine Compute Pressure API with WebRTC features (#250) (Monday, 15 April)
- Closed: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move source to options (#262) (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move source to options (#262) (Friday, 12 April)
- Closed: [compute-pressure] Move source to options (#262) (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move source to options (#262) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move options to observe() (#261) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move source to options (#262) (Monday, 8 April)
- Closed: [compute-pressure] PressureObserver options object: constructor vs observe method (#256) (Monday, 8 April)
- [compute-pressure] Move source to options (#262) (Monday, 8 April)
- Closed: [compute-pressure] Move Options to observe? (#259) (Friday, 5 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move options to observe() (#261) (Friday, 5 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move options to observe() (#261) (Friday, 5 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move Options to observe? (#259) (Thursday, 4 April)
- [compute-pressure] Move Options to observe? (#259) (Thursday, 4 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] PressureObserver options object: constructor vs observe method (#256) (Tuesday, 2 April)
Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
- Re: [geolocation-api] Support floorLevel on GeolocationCoordinates? (#122) (Thursday, 25 April)
- Closed: [geolocation-api] Support floorLevel on GeolocationCoordinates? (#122) (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] chore: show new .toJSON() capability (#151) (Tuesday, 23 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Define "geographic coordinates" (#136) (Thursday, 18 April)
- Closed: [geolocation-api] Define "geographic coordinates" (#136) (Thursday, 18 April)
- Closed: [geolocation-api] Set up process and markers for updating the Proposed Edited Recommendation (#148) (Monday, 15 April)
- Closed: [geolocation-api] Add support for converting Geolocation Position+Coordinates to JSON (object) (#145) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Addition: expose .toJSON() on GeolocationCoordinates + GeolocationPosition (#147) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] "Latest published version" in editor's draft points to wrong place (#150) (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Addition: expose .toJSON() on GeolocationCoordinates + GeolocationPosition (#147) (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] chore: put in updatable rec infra (#149) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] chore: put in updatable rec infra (#149) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Addition: expose .toJSON() on GeolocationCoordinates + GeolocationPosition (#147) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Correction: Clarify units and reference geodetic system for latitude and longitude (#138) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Closed: [geolocation-api] What does "decimal degrees" mean? (#135) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Add support for converting GeolocationCoordinates to JSON (object) (#145) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Expose .toJSON() on GeolocationCoordinates (#147) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Add support for converting GeolocationCoordinates to JSON (object) (#145) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Expose .toJSON() on GeolocationCoordinates (#147) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Set up process and markers for updating the Proposed Edited Recommendation (#148) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Correction: Clarify units and reference geodetic system for latitude and longitude (#138) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] [Editorial] Clarify units and reference geodetic system for latitude and longitude (#138) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- [geolocation-api] Set up process and markers for updating the Proposed Edited Recommendation (#148) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- [screen-wake-lock] Add more visibility tests (#373) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add doc is fully active check (#367) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add doc is fully active check (#367) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add doc is fully active check (#367) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add doc is fully active check (#367) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add doc is fully active check (#367) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Require user activation to use API (#48) (Monday, 8 April)
- [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Monday, 8 April)
- [geolocation-api] Add support for converting GeolocationCoordinates to JSON (object) (#145) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] chore: bring Marcos out of retirement (#143) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Chore auto-publish.yml: update WG decision URL (#152) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] "No permission" and "sensors unable to provide readings" are distinguishable (#148) (Tuesday, 2 April)
Mark Fulton via GitHub
Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Is PressureRecord.time a timestamp or a time that is relative to timeOrigin? (#257) (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] supportedSources should not have [SameObject] (#269) (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] supportedSources should not have [SameObject] (#269) (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] supportedSources should not have [SameObject] (#269) (Friday, 26 April)
- [compute-pressure] supportedSources should not have [SameObject] (#269) (Friday, 26 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Clarify what supportedSources() should expose. (#266) (Thursday, 25 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] automation: Adapt to Generic Sensor changes to stash provided readings (#147) (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Move source to options (#262) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [compute-pressure] Get rid of the promise returned by observe (#258) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add doc is fully active check (#367) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add more visibility tests (#373) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] automation: Adapt to Generic Sensor changes to stash provided readings (#147) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [screen-wake-lock] Add doc is fully active check (#367) (Monday, 8 April)
Reilly Grant via GitHub
- Re: [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Monday, 15 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Addition: expose .toJSON() on GeolocationCoordinates + GeolocationPosition (#147) (Friday, 12 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] chore: put in updatable rec infra (#149) (Thursday, 11 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Add support for converting GeolocationCoordinates to JSON (object) (#145) (Wednesday, 10 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Expose .toJSON() on GeolocationCoordinates (#147) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Require user activation to use API (#48) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [screen-wake-lock] Require transient activation (#351) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] A means to test the API via Web Driver (#146) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [geolocation-api] Add support for converting GeolocationCoordinates to JSON (object) (#145) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] automation: Adapt to Generic Sensor changes to stash provided readings (#147) (Friday, 5 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] How to check when permission is denied? (#148) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [geolocation-sensor] Support geolocation (especially geofencing) in the "background" (#22) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [geolocation-sensor] Support geolocation (especially geofencing) in the "background" (#22) (Monday, 1 April)
Thomas Steiner via GitHub
Tom Hilburger via GitHub
Vivek Vishal via GitHub
Yoav Weiss via GitHub
Last message date: Monday, 29 April 2024 16:34:23 UTC