public-device-apis-log@w3.org from December 2016 by date

Monday, 26 December 2016

[magnetometer] Local coordinates could use further detail/examples Mark Foltz via GitHub
[magnetometer] Shouldn't need Web Service to compute declination Mark Foltz via GitHub
[sensors] SensorReading.timeStamp could be clarified Mark Foltz via GitHub
[sensors] Need API to report platform accuracy changes Mark Foltz via GitHub
[ambient-light] Auto reporting mode is not defined Mark Foltz via GitHub

Thursday, 22 December 2016

Re: [html-media-capture] VideoFacingModeEnum as the capture attribute's value legion80 via GitHub

Tuesday, 20 December 2016

Closed: [wake-lock] Several defined terms are way too generic Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
Re: [wake-lock] Several defined terms are way too generic Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
Re: [wake-lock] Current API not friendly to components Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
Closed: [wake-lock] Current API not friendly to components Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
Closed: [wake-lock] System lock should be specified Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
Re: [wake-lock] System lock should be specified Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
Closed: [wake-lock] Plans for v2 Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
[wake-lock] Review the Privacy & Security section Andrey Logvinov via GitHub
Re: [wake-lock] Spec update Andrey Logvinov via GitHub

Monday, 19 December 2016

Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Rick Waldron via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC moka via GitHub

Sunday, 18 December 2016

Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub

Saturday, 17 December 2016

Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub

Friday, 16 December 2016

Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC moka via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Alexander Shalamov via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' only when data changes and considering frequency hint Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub

Thursday, 15 December 2016

Re: [sensors] Add abstract operation for constructing a SensorReading Tobie Langel via GitHub
Closed: [sensors] Add abstract operation for constructing a SensorReading Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] SensorReadings must be immutable. Tobie Langel via GitHub
Closed: [sensors] SensorReadings must be immutable. Tobie Langel via GitHub
Closed: [sensors] Should SensorReading be a dictionary? Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Should SensorReading be a dictionary? Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] SensorErrorEvent IDL doesn't match Blink Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
Re: [wake-lock] Spec update Andrey Logvinov via GitHub

Monday, 12 December 2016

Closed: [sensors] SensorErrorEvent IDL doesn't match Blink Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] SensorErrorEvent IDL doesn't match Blink Tobie Langel via GitHub

Friday, 9 December 2016

Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC moka via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Alexander Shalamov via GitHub

Wednesday, 7 December 2016

Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Rick Waldron via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Rick Waldron via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC moka via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Alexander Shalamov via GitHub

Tuesday, 6 December 2016

Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC moka via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC moka via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC moka via GitHub
Re: [sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub
[sensors] Don't allocate response objects to avoid triggering GC Tobie Langel via GitHub

Last message date: Monday, 26 December 2016 19:39:22 UTC