W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: How would option b) on the last straw poll of 12 March work?

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:34:12 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20150315003403.GA8719@w3.org>
* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2015-03-12 13:56-0700]
> There were a number of WG members who voted for:
>   b) The main specification shall include the higher-level language
>   constructs only and the rest shall be defined in add-ons.
> Can any one describe how this option would work?  Would there be a single
> way of defining the meaning of the entire language (main spec and add-ons)
> or would there be several ways of the defining what constructs mean?

As a down-payment, I offer <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/>.
I hope to produce a start on an axiomatic semantics and a SPARQL semantics

> peter


office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Sunday, 15 March 2015 00:34:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:17 UTC