How would option b) on the last straw poll of 12 March work? from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2015-03-12 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:56:22 -0700
To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5501FD76.1010001@gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There were a number of WG members who voted for:
  b) The main specification shall include the higher-level language
  constructs only and the rest shall be defined in add-ons.

Can any one describe how this option would work?  Would there be a single
way of defining the meaning of the entire language (main spec and add-ons)
or would there be several ways of the defining what constructs mean?



peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVAf12AAoJECjN6+QThfjzmIQIAJmZd8Z3mxE3klutnEpTehoC
W07T3dip5/n8JprBK5Lw1qpe8p8SyUyDQ1eVoelKXVnIHq7DWtbc1GFm7u2Rq/sJ
fw8WFeblQw6nSa4CnV9cxNP5bgItA1A6msj2ZBNx6vh4ZYnYRnPBDqWswYfO4zOY
sWwYdbrFlSQDct7dz1LPksybWQ4ghceLIUphNJ7lldYz73WsLqzUICOv9f0zn8kX
ZqJaVt1v94rev2exllmzvefzTm6sVB18sO8zYKE9q1NMdVmf8Y+9eD2IdYqu9X7q
8y9KDMJR+4kGZ21EA0m6XzttZCmr54JfI51qNTQdipo8zTNx264cVOy/eb4bJBg=
=3veP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 20:56:52 UTC