W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: How would option b) on the last straw poll of 12 March work?

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:12:39 +1000
Message-ID: <550611E7.7090707@topquadrant.com>
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org

this looks like yet another ShEx specification to me. None of the input 
from the "SPIN" camp from the last half a year has been integrated. You 
should probably rename your document accordingly, at least to clarify 
that this is about some variant of the SHACL Core Profile only.


On 3/15/2015 10:34, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> [2015-03-12 13:56-0700]
>> There were a number of WG members who voted for:
>>    b) The main specification shall include the higher-level language
>>    constructs only and the rest shall be defined in add-ons.
>> Can any one describe how this option would work?  Would there be a single
>> way of defining the meaning of the entire language (main spec and add-ons)
>> or would there be several ways of the defining what constructs mean?
> As a down-payment, I offer <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/>.
> I hope to produce a start on an axiomatic semantics and a SPARQL semantics
> tomorrow.
>> peter
Received on Sunday, 15 March 2015 23:13:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:17 UTC