Re: How would option b) on the last straw poll of 12 March work?

Hi Eric,

> On 15 Mar 2015, at 00:34, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> As a down-payment, I offer <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/>.

The SHACL language as described in your draft doesn’t have an extension mechanism.

Is this just a temporary omission and will it be added?

Or is the intention that “SHACL” is a subset of some other language, and the other language has an extension mechanism, and the “SHACL” subset doesn’t include the extension mechanism?

> I hope to produce a start on an axiomatic semantics and a SPARQL semantics
> tomorrow.

Any progress on the SPARQL semantics?

If this was a Recommendation-track document, how would it use the words “Informative” and “Normative”?

Best,
Richard

Received on Thursday, 19 March 2015 20:52:19 UTC