- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:49:43 +0200
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On 25/08/15 14:30, L. David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 2015-08-25 13:41 +0200, Simon Sapin wrote: >> CSSWG resolved today that that tests invalidated by later (levels of) specs >> should allow either behavior. For refetests, that means having more than one >> possible reference. > > Or at least *may* mean that. There are often other, simpler, > solutions, which I think are generally preferable. Yes, that’s a good point. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 12:50:21 UTC