On 25/08/15 14:30, L. David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 2015-08-25 13:41 +0200, Simon Sapin wrote: >> CSSWG resolved today that that tests invalidated by later (levels of) specs >> should allow either behavior. For refetests, that means having more than one >> possible reference. > > Or at least *may* mean that. There are often other, simpler, > solutions, which I think are generally preferable. Yes, that’s a good point. -- Simon SapinReceived on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 12:50:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:21 UTC