Re: Tests that fail in UAs that implement the most recent spec.

On 25/08/15 14:30, L. David Baron wrote:
> On Tuesday 2015-08-25 13:41 +0200, Simon Sapin wrote:
>> CSSWG resolved today that that tests invalidated by later (levels of) specs
>> should allow either behavior. For refetests, that means having more than one
>> possible reference.
>
> Or at least *may* mean that.  There are often other, simpler,
> solutions, which I think are generally preferable.

Yes, that’s a good point.

-- 
Simon Sapin

Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 12:50:21 UTC