W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > August 2015

Re: [CSS21][CSS22] Seeking review of position:fixed edge case test

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:13:48 -0400
To: "Linss, Peter" <peter.linss@hp.com>
Cc: Chris Rebert <csswg@rebertia.com>, Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, chris@rebertia.com
Message-ID: <a5414f158f486a220cf1130cade89fec@gtalbot.org>
Le 2015-08-17 19:10, Linss, Peter a écrit :
> On Aug 17, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> 
> wrote:
>> Le 2015-08-17 15:08, Chris Rebert a écrit :
>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Gérard Talbot
>>> <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> wrote:
>>>> Le 2015-07-27 03:21, Chris Rebert a écrit :


>>>> 3-
>>>>    <link rel="help"
>>>> href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visuren.html#choose-position" />
>>>>    <link rel="help"
>>>> href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#abs-non-replaced-width" 
>>>> />
>>>>    <link rel="help"
>>>> href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#abs-non-replaced-height" 
>>>> />
>>>> Do not link to draft spec as they can change or will change in the 
>>>> future.
>>> Fixed.
>>> Sorry, I had gotten confused since web-platform-tests uses the exact
>>> opposite convention.
>>> For the record, http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
>>> does not explicitly mention this rule, although its example does use
>>> non-draft links.
>> Then, in my opinion, it should state such guideline and then be 
>> updated accordingly.
>> Such guideline is not mentioned in the documentation. As a test 
>> author, you want to provide a link to the most stable version of a 
>> spec so that your test remains as much reliable and complete as 
>> possible. Once a spec becomes Proposed Recommendation or Technical 
>> Recommendation, then *I think (speculation)* working drafts no longer 
>> exist and links are not redirected.
>> "
>> This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by 
>> other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document 
>> as other than work in progress.
>> "
>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/#status
> This is actually not a requirement. While it's best for test to link
> to the most stable version of a spec, linking to a draft is fine, and
> sometimes necessary if the tested features are not published on /TR
> yet. Our tools deal with draft links just fine.

Peter, there is no css22 directory right now in

If the test links to a section of css22, then where will that test be 
? Just asking here

> It is possible however for anchors to change in drafts, and if that
> happens the tests will beed to be updated, but as drafts mature we do
> try to avoid it.

In my opinion, this is not likely. People will just use a link to a spec 
(working draft, editor draft, CR, whatever here) and forget about that 
test once submitted.

Test Format Guidelines

Test Style Guidelines

Test Templates

CSS Naming Guidelines

Test Review Checklist

CSS Metadata
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2015 04:14:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:21 UTC