W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > August 2015

Re: inline-table alignment test

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:45:29 -0400
To: 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime) <hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com>
Cc: Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
Message-ID: <002fda38e98ed5c53753183729641dc7@gtalbot.org>
Le 2015-08-12 12:10, 塩澤 元 a écrit :
> Gérard,
> I've submitted a new tests for inline-table alignment.
> https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/b7df87b05e86
> I have created tests for only 'mixed' and 'upright' because you 
> mentioned
> that it is better to do so only for this two properties.^[1]
> [1]:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2015Jul/0035.html
> Hajime.

inline-table alignment - central alignment with vertical layout

Proposed minor tunings for all 4 inline-table-alignment-00? tests

font: 3.75em/1 Ahem; /* computes to 60px */

replaced with

font: 3.75em/1 Ahem; /* computes to 60px/60px */

<span class="row" id="last">B</span>

replaced with

<span class="row" id="last">T</span>

I am now thinking we should have been using "L" (for last) and "F" (for 
first) instead of "I" and "B" in all inline-[block | 
table]-alignment-00? tests so that the tests are easier to review with 
those more helpful, meaningful characters.

Overall, all 4 tests look excellent and they should be a good challenge 
and meaningful testing for browser manufacturers.

Test Format Guidelines

Test Style Guidelines

Test Templates

CSS Naming Guidelines

Test Review Checklist

CSS Metadata
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2015 21:46:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:21 UTC