- From: Shiozawa, Hajime <hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:27:16 +0900
- To: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>, Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
- Cc: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, "Elika J. Etemad" <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
- Message-ID: <CAHSwuKPfou6Edir8kLXt_HKy=uM6uvu2-_exDkdOZDagCG94rw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Gérard, I have reviewed the following test. - block-flow-direction-001.xht ~ block-flow-direction-022.xht - line-box-direction-001.xht ~ line-box-direction-020.xht Here is comments for these test. 1. Some test-cases specify another specification's ref-file (/css-multicol-1/multicol-count-002-ref.xht) as its ref-file. I think that it is better to make a new ref-file (or copy) in css-writing-modes-3 directory. 2. All test-case uses 'yellow' and 'black' color. I think that it is better to use 'green' and 'blue' because these makes positive impression. 3. I think that it is better to add information to title in some test-case. - block-flow-direction-005.xht, block-flow-direction-006.xht before: CSS Writing Modes Test: float and 'vertical-rl' - block flow direction of block-level boxes after: CSS Writing Modes Test: float*-left* and 'vertical-rl' - block flow direction of block-level boxes - block-flow-direction-007.xht, block-flow-direction-007.xht before: CSS Writing Modes Test: float and 'vertical-lr' - block flow direction of block-level boxes after: CSS Writing Modes Test: float*-right* and 'vertical-lr' - block flow direction of block-level boxes - line-box-direction-005.xht, line-box-direction-006.xht before: CSS Writing Modes Test: float and 'vertical-rl' - ordering direction of line boxes after: CSS Writing Modes Test: float*-left* and 'vertical-rl' - ordering direction of line boxes - line-box-direction-007.xht, line-box-direction-008.xht before: CSS Writing Modes Test: float and 'vertical-lr' - ordering direction of line boxes after: CSS Writing Modes Test: float*-right* and 'vertical-lr' - ordering direction of line boxes 4. There is not line-box-direction-*004*.xht. Why is this missing? During this weekend, I will review other test-case which you submitted. Hajime. 2014-12-19 15:31 GMT+09:00 Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>: > Le 2014-12-17 08:38, Koji Ishii a écrit : > > How long do you think it’ll take until you submit? >> > > Done. > > committed changeset 6935:a4b95a324593 22 tests (18 new tests) > committed changeset 6936:65afcff4b06b > committed changeset 6937:912ef3c7b408 (block-flow-direction-023) > committed changeset 6938:ca6495d8b9df 29 tests > committed changeset 6939:65b6d0358772 7 tests and 7 images > committed changeset 6940:81f6362c4cb7 1 test and 3 images > > They are all here, submitted on december 18th: > > http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/?C=M;O=D > > -------- > > I have added 2 last-minute tests: > > http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/block- > flow-direction-023.xht > > which is a minor variant of block-flow-direction-003 > > and > > http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/form- > controls-vert-rl-005.xht > > I now think that maybe I should create a block-flow-direction-024 which > would be a minor variant of block-flow-direction-002 to balance things... > > -------- > > One last thing I need to check with Peter Linss. > > Shepherd is able to detect that the link target in the Public spec has > been changed in the Editor’s Draft. So, that means > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css-writing-modes-3/#writing-mode > is pointing to section 3.1 but, in the Editors' draft, it is now > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-writing-modes-3/#block-flow > > I think Shepherd is only notifying me, informing me of such thing .... I > do not think I need to change the actual, current > <link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css-writing-modes-3/#writing- > mode" title="3.1 Block Flow Direction: the writing-mode property" /> > > --------- > > > I have not managed >> yet but probably either Elika, Hajime, and/or I are the best >> candidates to review them. Should we wait for the submission and >> review on Shepherd, or would it help you if we review earlier on your >> site? >> > > Please wait that the tonight (00:00 Pacific Day Time) build process works > and does not break! > > You can review those 58 tests after that in emails in the Public CSS Test > suite mailing list or in Shepherd. > > My site is acting like an /incoming folder, like a transitory place where > draft tests are standing by. So, those tests may not be ready. > > Gérard > -- > Test Format Guidelines > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html > > Test Style Guidelines > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html > > Test Templates > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html > > CSS Naming Guidelines > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html > > Test Review Checklist > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html > > CSS Metadata > http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html > -- # 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime) # mail: hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com
Received on Thursday, 25 December 2014 15:27:44 UTC