On Wednesday 2014-04-23 17:34 -0700, Peter Linss wrote: > Is the pain on your end that you'd need for the Mozilla tests to stay under a common directory or that the Mozilla repository would have to be refactored so that it could be mapped to the csswg repo? They don't necessarily need to be in *one* common directory, but it seems helpful to have them separated so that importing can be done easily (including dealing with test removal, which certainly happens sometimes as a result of spec changes). I think it's also perhaps been useful to have some concept of ownership, given that we don't (I think) have the resources to deal with updating tests for spec changes in a better way, when implementors are updating to match the same spec change at different times. Then again, I don't think any of the specs for which we've contributed tests in this way have advanced through the process yet, so it might be too early to judge the overall result. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)Received on Thursday, 24 April 2014 01:00:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:20 UTC