Text-orientation and text-underline-position tests (text-orientation-mixed-001)

Kazuaki,

http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/ktakemura/submitted/text-orientation-mixed-001.xht

<p>Test passes if both "Text sample" rectangles are
<strong>identical</strong>: Only "T" should be displayed vertically, and
"ext Sample" should be displayed sideways.</p>

Suggestion (more precise):

<p>Test passes if both "Text sample" rectangles are
<strong>identical</strong>: only "T" should be displayed vertically and
"ext sample" should be displayed sideways.</p>



line 27: margin: 10px;

You add 10px on all 4 sides... but the reftest only adds margin-right of
10px.



This text-orientation-mixed-001.png image has smooth edges, anti-aliased
edges but the div#vertical has aliased edges. I have right now no idea
how to work around this, except by using Ahem font. Some browsers like
Opera under Linux (and only under Linux) will anti-alias text by
default.

Over here, between DejaVuSerif-webfont.woff and the
text-orientation-mixed-001.png, the "e" glyphs are different, slightly
different but noticeable; the "a" are also a bit different.
This could be because DejaVuSerif-webfont.woff is based on version 2.29
(2010-12-23) while, on my system, when creating that image with, say,
GIMP 2.8.2, I would be using DejaVu Serif version 2.33 (2011-02-27)
which could be different. Also, the tool by which we create .woff could
be inaccurate too.

"
I would suggest being cautious about using subsetting tools if you don't
know much about their quality or where their deficiencies lie. There are
many tools that will create all sorts of funky problems (bad cmaps,
incorrect or inconsistent tables, etc.).
"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2013Feb/0037.html

and this DejaVuSerif-webfont.woff is a subset of DejaVu Serif (only
English glyphs).


Kazuaki, (it's 03:30 am here) I will check your other tests tomorrow. I
won't go to the meeting I was expecting to; so I should have time for
your tests tomorrow.

Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/

Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html



-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011:
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite harness:
http://test.csswg.org/harness/

Contributing to to CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html

Received on Friday, 15 March 2013 07:30:21 UTC