- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:42:29 -0700
- To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
These tests: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-051.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-052.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-053.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-054.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-055.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/html4/font-056.htm http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-051.xht http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-052.xht http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-053.xht http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-054.xht http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-055.xht http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20101001/xhtml1/font-056.xht are invalid because the system font keywords are perfectly good family names. The declaration: font: 32px caption; is equivalent to: font: initial; font-size: 32px; font-family: caption; and is perfectly valid. The 'caption' in this case is NOT a system font keyword, but it's perfectly legal. These tests should be reversed to test that the declaration is allowed. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 20:43:00 UTC