W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > July 2010

RE: [CSS 2.1] Invalid test cases (5 still needing review)

From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:35:26 -0700
Message-ID: <b3755ae51fdc1d4fbef12eb1349e3a18.squirrel@cp3.shieldhost.com>
To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Cc: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>

> Here is an update for the Invalid Test cases list. Please look over it
> and see if you can help review and/or update.
> Still needing review:
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/floats-148.htm

The percentage is calculated with respect to the width of the generated
box's containing block. (...) If the containing block's width depends on
this element's width, then the resulting layout is undefined in CSS 2.1.

And the width of the generated box's containing block itself would have
to be determined by a result of shrink-to-fit width calculation. This
looks very much as circular logic to me.

The test is rejectable for another reason: there is no clear, specified
dimensions given as expected results for the green square.

> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/inlines-018.htm

The p.fail element has no vertical margin and the inlined div should not
cause a new line to be created; so it should be positioned at (0,0) in
document box. IMO this test is incorrect.

> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/inlines-019.htm

Same thing here. IMO the test is incorrect.

I have looked at
but I have no idea at all for now on these 2.

regards, Gérard
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:

CSS 2.1 test suite (beta 2; July 27th 2010):

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 18:36:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:15 UTC