- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:35:26 -0700
- To: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
- Cc: "Arron Eicholz" <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
> Here is an update for the Invalid Test cases list. Please look over it > and see if you can help review and/or update. > > Still needing review: > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/floats-148.htm " The percentage is calculated with respect to the width of the generated box's containing block. (...) If the containing block's width depends on this element's width, then the resulting layout is undefined in CSS 2.1. " And the width of the generated box's containing block itself would have to be determined by a result of shrink-to-fit width calculation. This looks very much as circular logic to me. The test is rejectable for another reason: there is no clear, specified dimensions given as expected results for the green square. > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/inlines-018.htm The p.fail element has no vertical margin and the inlined div should not cause a new line to be created; so it should be positioned at (0,0) in document box. IMO this test is incorrect. > http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/inlines-019.htm Same thing here. IMO the test is incorrect. I have looked at http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/inlines-008.htm and http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/margin-collapse-136.htm but I have no idea at all for now on these 2. regards, Gérard -- Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite: http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ CSS 2.1 test suite (beta 2; July 27th 2010): http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/toc.html CSS 2.1 test suite contributors: http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/
Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 18:36:02 UTC