RE: [CSS 2.1] cases that do not pass in any browser

> I think we should just remove these cases, any objections?:
> (I plan to remove cases on 8/5 if there are no objections.)
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/abspos-005.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/active-selector-003.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/at-charset-utf16-be-002.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/at-charset-utf16-le-002.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/blocks-023.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/blocks-024.htm
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/margin-collapse-144.htm
> This test assumes that
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2003AprJun/0347.html is
> accepted and it was not.
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/margin-collapse-149.htm
> Same reason as margin-collapse-144.
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/margin-collapse-150.htm
> This test assumes that
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2003AprJun/0446.html is
> accepted and it was not.
> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100701/html4/margin-collapse-167.htm
> This case is not calculating the position of a box, with adjacent top
> and bottom margins, correctly. #parent should be positioned at 4em since
> one of its adjoining child margins has margin-top:4em.

Arron, as far as I am concerned, you can remove all of the above testcases.

I will examine the others (some are complex) in your to-remove-list.

regards, Gérard
-- 
Contributions to the CSS 2.1 test suite:
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

CSS 2.1 test suite (beta 2; July 27th 2010):
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100727/html4/toc.html

CSS 2.1 test suite contributors:
http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/

Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2010 02:31:13 UTC