- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:00:49 -0700
- To: Gabriele Romanato <gabriele.romanato@gmail.com>
- CC: css test <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Gabriele Romanato wrote: > http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/tables/ table-acid-test.xht This test is very hard to understand. Please - indent properly - add comments explaining what you're trying to prove table-alignment-000.xht This test relies on support for HTML align/valign attributes and also on some complex selectors. It's a good idea to make a test like this, but I think the test would be more effective if - you used simple class or ID selectors - you used "X" in Ahem as the text of the table cells - you either - used background images to put red where the X should be so the end result would be a green box - used Ahem and margins to make a reference rendering so you're not relying on HTML attributes Somewhere there should be a test for the HTML attributes, but I don't believe the CSS2.1 test suite is the right place for that. table-alignment-001.xht There are two problems with this test: - it's too big - the image doesn't have visible boundaries, so it's not possible to see its alignment Also I can't tell what this test is testing that is different from the previous test. table-background-000.xht It's a good test, but there are a few things I'd change about this test: - Use CSS for the borders - Increase the border-spacing - Use for the cell content so it doesn't distract from the image - Use a different background image: it's cute, but we can't license this one. Using a drawing or photo you created yourself would be best. table-background-001.xht Also a very good test. But again, you should - Use CSS for the borders - Increase the border-spacing - Use for the cell contents. table-float-000.xht I think with a little work you'd have a good test here, but it's right now not very clear what you are trying to prove. I suggest simplifying it and writing an assertion. table-reflow-000.xht CSS2.1 doesn't define what happens here, so we can't include it in the test suite. table-reflow-001.xht table-reflow-002.xht These are a good tests of fixed table layout, but need to be simplified a lot. Most of the HTML is irrelevant to what you're testing here. table-reflow-003.xht table-reflow-004.xht table-reflow-005.xht table-reflow-006.xht table-reflow-007.xht These tests are more demonstration than conformance test. I'm sure they're inspiring for web authors, but there's no clear pass condition. table-reflow-008.xht It's not very clear what this test is testing. Perhaps it's testing "display: block" in the context of auto table cell sizing. In that case the test could be simplified by removing the second two columns, the second row, and replacing the text with a series of (which would ensure that the top cell's content is longer than the bottom cell's content as well as taking unnecessary text out of the test). table-reflow-009.xht table-reflow-010.xht table-reflow-012.xht table-reflow-013.xht table-reflow-014.xht The rendering of this is actually undefined in CSS2.1 (percentages inside shrink-wrap are not defined), so while they would be good tests to consider when writing CSS3 Tables, I can't add them to the CSS2.1 test suite. table-reflow-011.xht As with table-reflow-008.xht, it's not very clear what this test is testing. There are several things going on in this test, I can't tell what exactly you're trying to prove. table-reflow-015.xht This an interesting test. It could be a test for the 'border' attribute and CSS borders, but because tables size from the border edge instead of the content edge, it's not. Instead it's testing whether that pixel-thin inner border changes the table width (which it shouldn't). But one pixel is too small to be noticeable, so it's not a very good test for table width sizing, either. Also it tests the 'border' attribute, which is outside the scope of CSS2.1. Maybe we need a test suite for presentational HTML -> CSS mapping, and a test based on this (and your align/valign one) could go in there. table-reflow-016.html Likewise for this. HTML attribute mapping is out of scope for CSS 2.1. (Also this test needs some hefty simplification.) table-reflow-017.xht This /looks/ interesting, but what is it trying to prove? table-reflow-018.xht This one has a few problems - Pass/fail is hard to determine because the heights are so small - It's not possible to determine pass/fail without reading the source - I can't figure out what this test is trying to prove. table-reflow-019.xht This test seems more like a test of the colspan attribute than anything. And there's no clear pass condition. table-reflow-020.xht table-reflow-021.xht These are good tests, but the behavior is not defined in CSS2.1. (Auto table layout is not defined in CSS2.1.) So unfortunately we can't accept it for the CSS2.1 test suite. (Another test for CSS3 Tables...) Also, you should remove the borders and text from the table (or make the text ) and make each table a blue box for the purpose of this test: you're not testing the contents of the tables, just their widths. I think I should create a directory for css3-tables so we can start collecting some of these tests. table-reflow-022.xht Whether this test is valid depends on the window size. At a window size smaller than the narrow table's intrinsic width, the test will always fail. Also shrink-wrap widths aren't defined by CSS2.1... so I can't add this to the 2.1 test suite. table-reflow-023.xht So, this test depends on - <object>'s 'width' attribute being supported - table cells having no padding - table cells having no border, or the border being included in the cell's width. And, again, auto table layout isn't specified in CSS2.1... table-reflow-024.xht This would make a good test if you simplified it down to just the cell, put a red background on the cell, and removed all the unnecessary text. (It also needs a better title, something that reflects what's being tested.) table-reflow-025.xht This is a really technique, and if I were writing tests for layered table backgrounds I would totally use it. :) But I can't figure out what you're testing here. In all cases, please indent your code. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 00:01:31 UTC