- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:17:42 -0500
- To: Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>
- CC: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Stewart Brodie wrote: > fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> There's very little overhead for the permission granting form. You can >> fill it out here: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/testgrants2-200409/ > > I have now done this. > > >> The template for new tests is here: >> http://csswg.inkedblade.net/test/css2.1/format > > OK, I've had a go at a few that cover some of the text-decoration cases that > I've been looking at recently: http:///www.metahusky.net/~stewart/css/tests/ > Am I doing it right? Looks pretty good. I'd suggest three things: - use black text for the instructions, not green - assert somewhere that there must be no red - if you can think of a way to avoid obscuring the instructions with the test lines in the fourth test, that would be good. :) "inheritance" isn't quite the right word here, because text-decoration doesn't inherit in the CSS sense of the word. I'm not sure what to use instead.. maybe text-decoration-descend, and e.g. "text-decoration should not affect absolutely- or fixed-positioned descendants"? ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 11 January 2008 17:17:52 UTC