Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, fantasai wrote: >> Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think it would be good if the tests were licensed under the MIT license as >>> that makes it much more clear for software projects whether they can reuse >>> them. I believe the W3C Document License is currently not suitable for >>> everyone. >> Can you give a specific example, please? > > The W3C document license doesn't allow for modifications, and requires > more boilerplate than ideal. This makes it unsuitable for a number of > projects. Yes, this I agree is a problem, and I'm talking with Rigo about it. But again, if you or Anne have specific examples that would help. ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 07:33:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:13 UTC