Re: Implementation report template for 20060307 css3-selectors test suite

• From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
• Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:39:06 -0400
• To: public-css-testsuite@w3.org, w3c-css-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <46B2BF7A.8010408@inkedblade.net>

L. David Baron wrote:
> I updated the implementation report template at
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS3/Selectors/20041216/implementreportTEMPLATE.html
> based on the change list at:
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS3/Selectors/20060307/CHANGES
> to match the 20060307 version of the test suite.  The revised
> implementation report is at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2007Jul/att-0026/implementreportTEMPLATE.html
> ...
> Should I be listing 27a and 27b as failure tests?

I'm not sure. It would depend on whether
   foo:not(foo)
would be considered a failure test. There's nothing invalid about those tests,
they're just using selectors that will never match.

> And does anybody see a better solution for how to list 27a?

List it under :root? 27b might also fit better there.

~fantasai

Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 05:39:35 UTC