- From: Chris Harrelson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 02:58:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
chrishtr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-selectors] has-child selector == Proposal: add a selector that matches an element if a direct child matches the selector in the function. "all a elements that contain an img" -> `a:has-child(img)` Motivation: [#2 missing-features request](https://2019.stateofcss.com/opinions/#missing-features) in the state-of-CSS 2019 survey. Since it only matches direct children, it may be no more expensive than sibling selectors. A related selector that was considered and removed as too expensive and slow (AIUI) is [:has]( https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#relational). See also resolution regarding it [here](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3925#issuecomment-492724267). @tabatkins @lilles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4903 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 March 2020 02:58:37 UTC