- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:19:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Hopefully most of the respondents actually _did_ mean parent (`:has-child`) and not ancestor (`:has-descendant`). @argyleink @una Do you have any gut feeling regarding this? The survey says "parent selector", which we're interpreting as "_immediate_ parent selector", whereas I'm worried some respondents actually want "ancestor selector" (which would be way more expensive). -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4903#issuecomment-604851932 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 March 2020 07:19:04 UTC