W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > March 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors] has-child selector (#4903)

From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:19:01 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-604851932-1585293540-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Hopefully most of the respondents actually _did_ mean parent (`:has-child`) and not ancestor (`:has-descendant`).

@argyleink @una Do you have any gut feeling regarding this? The survey says "parent selector", which we're interpreting as "_immediate_ parent selector", whereas I'm worried some respondents actually want "ancestor selector" (which would be way more expensive).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by andruud
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4903#issuecomment-604851932 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 March 2020 07:19:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:02 UTC