W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > March 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors] has-child selector (#4903)

From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:19:01 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-604851932-1585293540-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Hopefully most of the respondents actually _did_ mean parent (`:has-child`) and not ancestor (`:has-descendant`).

@argyleink @una Do you have any gut feeling regarding this? The survey says "parent selector", which we're interpreting as "_immediate_ parent selector", whereas I'm worried some respondents actually want "ancestor selector" (which would be way more expensive).

GitHub Notification of comment by andruud
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4903#issuecomment-604851932 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 March 2020 07:19:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:02 UTC