> Sure, it's only one-level ancestor, but it is not if you nest them, right? So div:has-child(div:has-child(img)) or such. In previous discussions of this (largely predating us using GH, unfortunately), it was presumed that nesting `:has-child()` would be invalid. So you could have `:has-child()` at multiple points in a selector, like `div:has-child(img) + label:has-child(:checked)`, but you wouldn't ever be able to recurse with it. I assume we'd definitely impose this restriction, else this is just a less convenient way of writing `:has()`, as you say. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4903#issuecomment-605176241 using your GitHub accountReceived on Friday, 27 March 2020 18:06:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:02 UTC