- From: Adam Argyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 23:05:02 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Hopefully most of the respondents actually did mean parent (:has-child) and not ancestor (:has-descendant).
> @argyleink @una Do you have any gut feeling regarding this?
From my experience folks exclusively mean ancestor querying. Eg, they want a child to own how it responds to a class or state findable further up the DOM. @bkardell had it right when using the `<` character, as a way of visualizing the intent `.dark < .my-component {...}`. I dont know anyone who's aware of `:has` when talking about this topic.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by argyleink
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4903#issuecomment-605349998 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 March 2020 23:05:04 UTC