Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Grid track sizing items spanning a flexible track

The Working Group just discussed `Grid track sizing items spanning a flexible track`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: edit in Rossen proposal in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2177`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Grid track sizing items spanning a flexible track<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2177<br>
&lt;dael> rego: Quite related, You have an item that spans 2 columns. One of them is outside it's flexible track and we weren't sure what would be the best result. We're not sure what's the core approach. Rossen was tyring to clarify in the last comment.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: There's a specific tweak to the algo you propose?<br>
&lt;dael> rego: Original algo was aligned that you don't expand a track with a flexible track sizing. Maybe we can open the use cases.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: We should try Rossen suggestion in the issue and see if it works. I haven't fully through it through but that's what I'd want to try.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: When we looked we played with magizine layouts. One recurring thing was when you have a splash page when an item that spans x columns and want to influence rest of layout. Those columns need to be flexible when you're on a browser. That was the original motivation.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Since then in the issue...we can go either way. I don't think there's enough concept to support one or the other. What I proposed should work.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Makes sense to me.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Do we need a resolution to edit in Rossen proposal?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Resolution to add Rossen proposal and we'll revisit<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/revisit/revisit if there's a problem/<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: edit in Rossen proposal in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2177<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2177#issuecomment-380084714 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 12:43:43 UTC