- From: James Craig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:17:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@frivoal wrote: > …I've grown warmer to the idea of separating the preference and the forced things, so either #586 or the same thing with a different word (`no-preference`?) for the falsey value is probably fine. I agree that `no-preference` is better than `default` > On the other hand, I don't like names like motion-preference which don't indicate which ways things go, as it makes the feature inconvenient to use in a boolean context, which I think would be bad to lose. I also would rather keep `prefers-reduced-motion` over `motion-preference` for the sake of the boolean context. ```css prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference | reduce ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by cookiecrook Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/442#issuecomment-266473791 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 16:17:13 UTC