- From: James Craig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:50:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@inoas wrote: > … what would you do about these: ```css increased-contrast-preference: decrease; /* say night mode */ reduced-motion-preference: double; /* say motions are okay but I want them to be very fast */ reduced-ink-usage-preference: high-quality; /* instead of ink-usage-preference: high-quality */ ``` Please be careful to avoid 'straw man' arguments. I don't think any of these hold up to scrutiny, but I'll respond to the first two: 1. You suggested: `increased-contrast-preference: decrease; /* night mode */` Given the broad range of contrast settings across implementations, I doubt we'll ever be able to standardize a single generic "increase contrast" setting. If anything, it's likely to be several more granular such as `prefers-reduced-transparency`, `prefers-minimum-contrast-ratio`, etc. It also seems likely that a "night-mode" media feature could be separate. 2. You suggested: `reduced-motion-preference: double; /* motion okay but I want them very fast */` This again seems unlikely to me, but if needed, seems better as a timing preference specific to transitions, rather than all motion. Maybe `prefers-minimum-transitions: no-preference | immediate | fast`? (Note: Not an endorsement.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by cookiecrook Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/442#issuecomment-266483769 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 16:50:54 UTC